Hottest May tournament ever!

It’s probably not very often that the first instruction given by the Tournament manager to the players at the beginning of a tounament is “Don’t kill yourselves!”. However, given the record-breaking temperatures in the last week of May, and the various medical conditions of some of the 8 competitors in the Phyllis Court/Blewbury C level AC tournament, this was not unreasonable advice! It was followed by practical instructions to pause the timer, should any player need to take on more water or just recuperate from the unrelenting heat.

I’m not sure if any availed themselves of pausing the timer, but certainly two were ready to drop out at different times on the first day (Tuesday 26th May), including our own Steve Fisher, recovering from a recent medical incident, and who had bravely taken a long bus journey from Abingdon to Henley, to arrive on time.

Although I had the lowest handicap (7) in the tournament, my expectations were not high, since, counter-intuitively, I also had the 2nd worst D-grade and I had also come 2nd to last in last year’s tournament. Nevertheless, I managed to win my first two matches and so got off to a flying start. I was also very glad for the shade afforded by the beautiful big trees at Phyllis Court, which began to invade Court 2 as the afternoon progressed.

However, as so often happens, my form mysteriously left me for the 3rd match against Colin Spencer, our furthest traveller from Downham CC in Norfolk. Shade or not, I was very glad to reach Peg-down, by which time, Colin had reached 2-back and set up a leave for my lift, while I had one ball still on hoop 1 and the other only on hoop 3 after repeated failed attempts. Score: 2-8

Wednesday was at Blewbury and another baking hot day, without a cloud in the sky. After carefully placing our balls in accordance the the Peg-down ‘map’, the 3rd match continued where we had left off, as did our respective standards of play! Colin was constantly hitting in, while even though I was playing a little better than in the first half, I was making little progress. However, despite Colin’s great roquets, he didn’t seem to be making much progress either! After 30 minutes or so I rediscovered my mo-jo and eventually won the match 16-11

In the 4th match I played Rick Lilley – another gifted GC player from Phyllis Court! Rick is still getting used to changing to the Solomon grip and had only won 1 of his first 3 games. However, he chose his game against me to find his form and proceeded to make a 10 hoop break with his first ball. This gave me a rare ‘contact lift’, but by now my long spell on the side-lines was having its effect, and I only managed to make hoop 2 before breaking down again. From then on I steadily got worse and worse, missing shorter and shorter roquets, while Rick raced to a speedy and decisive victory of 26-2.

By the 5th round only 6 of us were still playing, 3 of whom were on 3 wins: the said Colin Spencer from Downham, the veteran Martin Burger from Aldermaston, and myself. Due to the ‘who-beat-who’ principle in case of a draw, Martin and Colin had not only to win their final match, but were dependent on the result of the other match as well. I was down to play Martin and if a beat him, I won the tournament. I had beaten Martin last year in a handicap match when he was a 6 and I had the benefit of two bisques, but sadly for Martin, who is getting on a bit, his handicap has gone up to 8 in the last 12 months. Anyway, one benefit of losing so quickly against Rick is that I ended up having a very long, restful lunch-hour, waiting for Martin’s 4th round match to finish. Maybe that was what enabled me to beat him 19-11 and win the cup. Just goes to show – I may have come 2nd to last 12 months ago, but there’s always hope!

The first step to conquering All England

On a beautiful final day of April, four of us joined battle in the opening heat of the
All-England Handicap championships: Joe, Andy Evason, Deirdre, and Andrew Petit.
The joy of handicap play is that anyone might win! And so in the first round Andy E beat Joe 14-1 and in the 2nd round Andrew beat Joe 14-0 ! Meanwhile Andy went on to beat Deirdre and Andrew in the 2nd and 3rd rounds, and so now progresses to the next stage (an area final in August). Who knows where this might lead !

Meanwhile, Joe executed a just revenge (or reward?) on Andy and Andrew. Having judged that they had both become bandits over the winter, he had been threatening to reduce their handicaps for the last couple of months. Their decisive victories over him in this contest were the final straw! Andy’s AC handicap has been reduced from 7 to 4.5 and Andrew’s from 9 to 7. Neither know whether to be shocked, delighted, or just resigned !

Andrew Petit

Prebendal Manor Cup 2026

Holder: Andy Evason

The Prebendal is our Club’s annual, internal AC Handicap competition.

It will be played initially as a balanced Swiss format event, leading to semi-finals and final.

The cut off date for playing your four games will be the 26th August.

Semifinals and finals will be held on the 19th September.

Game Format

All matches except the Final should be played as 18pt games (1 and 3-back variation – as per AC rule 51.2.3) with a 2.5 hour time-limit. The Final will be contested as a 26pt game with a longer limit (e.g 3 or 3.5 hrs, dependent on the playing conditions on the day).

Games will be handicap, set against a base of 9:

In games involving at least one player of handicap less than 9, normal bisque allocations apply, subject to the standard reduction for 18 point games. e.g. player A with a handicap of 16, playing against B with a handicap of 4 is allocated 12 bisques reduced to 8.5 for an 18 point game.

If both players have a handicap of 9 or more, each player gets the number of bisques equal to their handicap minus 9, subject to the standard reduction for 18 point games.
E.g. Player C with a handicap of 11 vs. Player D with a handicap 14: Player C is allocated 2 bisques reduced to 1.5 and Player D is allocated 5 bisques reduced to 3.5

Competition format

All your games are predefined in a way that should give all competitors roughly the same strength opposing them.

You need to win a number of games to enter the knockout stage.

Note that you do not play everybody, but that everybody has the same number of opponents

You can play your preselected opponents in any order you wish. After you enter the score your latest opponent will disappear from your list of people to play.

More information on the format is below

Sorry, you must be logged in to enter a result. Sorry, you must be logged in to work with results.

Competition format – details

We are trying a new format this year, which we believe will provide the fairest possible chance for all entrants whatever their handicap (as it will be based on recent form), a chance to play at least 4 games as part of the opening stages, and greater flexibility as to when the matches are played

Swiss phase:

Each player has been allocated 4 games (opponents in the selection tool above) so they know who they need to play from the outset and can move through those games at the pace they want. There will be no waiting around for rounds to be completed. We will expect at least a game a month from every participant.

Qualification to the knock-out is based on achieving 3 wins (or more) from your 4 games

The target is for at least 4 players to qualify. If more than 4 qualify there will be quarterfinals with some players possibly receiving byes. If less than 4 qualify then those on 2 wins may need a playoff.

Knock-out phase

Semifinal and finals will be conducted on a knock-out basis

These will be arranged with reference to the performance in the Swiss phase, and by lot to resolved tie breaks

Some History

Deciding on the optimal format for a season long handicap competition can be quite difficult when there is an odd number of players or a number that does not neatly lend itself to being arranged for block play with equal sized blocks.

Various approaches can be used such as:

Blocks – need to be determined carefully to avoid ‘bandits’ marring the competition for everyone else, especially if there is only one qualifier per block

Uneven blocks – which can disadvantage players from larger bocks, or blocks were some games are left incomplete

Swiss format – requires rounds to complete before the next one is decided

Double elimination (or draw and process) – can leave some players with two few games and other with too many

Flexible Swiss – Needs to avoid players at the top of the tree not playing each other and can also have significant delays between fixtures

As a club we have used each of these in the past few years and none have been entirely satisfactory.

An new approach

With reference to the Tournament Regulations published by CqE and the discussion at the AC tournament Committee (ACTC, of which Joe is a member), there is no obviously better solution.

In Advanced play this has been addressed by the concept of the Burridge Swiss has been documented and is used in several prestige events. This seeks to even out the strength of opponents each participant meets. It uses as the proxy for ‘strength of opponent’ the DG (dynamic grade) of the entrants.

Handicap per se is not a fair proxy for our need, as in a handicap game both payers should have an equal chance of winning. However there is an approach we’d like to try, and this could also provide valuable information back to the ACTC.

It works like this:

A player has a handicap of N, with trigger point T and handicap index on their card of I

Players who are improving or are in form will likely be above their trigger point, or I  > T

Players who are not doing so well will likely be below their trigger point, or I < T

The difference between I and T, DH = I-T, is therefore a measure of their current strength.

If player one with an DH of +45 plays an opponent with DH of -45 we’d expect the first player to prevail more often than not, regardless of the actual handicaps

Therefore the proxy to a players strength is the value of DH.

The basis of the Burridge Swiss is to pre-draw 4 or 5 rounds of opponents, so that the average of the DH values each opponent faces is balanced and is as nearly equal as possible. Or everyone has an equal number of stronger and weaker players in their draw.

This will be the model for this year

Kay Memorial Trophy – 2026

Holder: Joe King

On Monday afternoons, from April 13th, court one will be set out for Short Croquet. From April 27th all members are expected to play their games as KMT games. Even if a player is not a premium member they are still eligible to play KMT games and should enter their results for the KMT ladder and on their handicap card.

However, whilst any member can reach the top of the KMT ladder, only the top 4 premium members (who have played a minimum of 6 KMT games) will qualify for the final knockout phase on 17th August to win the KMT Cup.

KMT games can also be played at times other than Monday afternoons.

  • The games are 14 points, with a time limit of 90 minutes
  • You may challenge any club member to a game, regardless of whether they are on the ladder already or are yet to play their first game.
  • These are qualifying games (provided that the courts are fully open and jumping is permitted) so both players must enter them on their handicap cards.
  • To join in please send an email to dr.s.m.fisher@gmail.com to have your name entered, play the game and one of you enters the results below. Results should be entered promptly for it all to work properly.

Enter results below

Sorry, you must be logged in to enter a result.

Results so far

NamePointsWinsGames
Peter Allan10622
Andy Evason10323
Joe King10311
Carol Jamieson10012
Steve Fisher10012
Andrew Petit9701
Claire King9701
Brian Jamieson9402

Your games

DateWinnerpointstoLoserPointsto
Sorry, you must be logged in to work with results.

Details of the format

Each player is initially assigned 100 ranking points. If a player beats a player of the same ranking then three points are transferred from the loser to the winner. However beating a higher ranked player results in more points being transferred and vice versa. Winning or losing a game may change your handicap but this change has no impact on the ranking points

You may challenge any club member to a game, regardless of whether they are on the ladder already or are yet to play their first game. Failure to accept the challenge without good reason and to play the game within two weeks results in a maximum score being recorded for the challenger and 0 for the person who failed to play. Such results do not go on handicap cards as regular results would.

You must play a minimum number of games to win.

A player's position is determined by ranking points, then wins, then net wins (#wins – #losses).

The number of points transferred is given in the table below.

Difference in ranking points before the gameIf player with higher ranking points winsIf player with lower ranking points wins
0-633
7-1124
12+15

In the event that two players have the same index, number of wins and net wins then who-beat-whom amongst the tied players, and finally net points will be applied manually at 23:59 on the 10th August to decide upon the four best premium member players to take part in the finals to be held on August 17 at 13.30. Should anyone be unavailable to play, their place will be offered to the next best qualifying participant.

The finals format has been chosen to give an advantage to the two players who have done best.

  • Qualifier 1 – Player 1 vs Player 2 (the loser gets a second chance)
  • Eliminator – Player 3 vs Player 4 (will be played at the same time as qualifier 1 and, as it’s name suggests, eliminates one player)
  • Qualifier 2 – Winner of Eliminator vs loser of Qualifier 1
  • Final – between the two qualifier winners